11/14/2023 4:10:52 AM
Bridgitte Posts: 53
|
Name: Jasmine
City: Durban
Area: Umhlanga/Gateway
Last Visit: November 2023
Full Profile: [View Jasmine's Full Profile]
______________________________________________________
This woman is super gorgeous and has the most beautiful smile and dimples. She has meat in all right places and already made arrangements to visit again. Her massage skills are perfect and she knows how to get rid of those knots. Sensual is amazing with the perfect view of her ontop.
______________________________________________________
Ratings:
Face: 5/5 Body: 5/5 Personality: 5/5 Telephone Manner: 5/5 Venue Cleanliness: 5/5 Personal Cleanliness: 5/5 Privacy: 5/5 Service: 5/5 ______________________________________________________
Will you return? Yes Advertiser looked like the Photos? Yes Secure Parking? Yes https://www.esa.co.za/escorts/viewEscort.php?uid=68110
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/14/2023 11:12:31 PM
Michael Posts: 102
|
May we have rates bro?
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/15/2023 5:00:08 AM
Assetmanager Posts: 1163
|
I have been reading ESA reviews recently. I find something very strange though.
There are no negative reviews that I came across.
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/15/2023 5:48:55 AM
Bridgitte Posts: 53
|
Michael wrote:
May we have rates bro? from 700 upwards from massage with happy ending and possibly fh from R1200 30min depending on hygiene
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/16/2023 12:20:44 AM
Cruzn Posts: 20
|
I feel there's something about this review that relates same too another review. . . Doesn't feel like a review feels more like an advert
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/16/2023 12:41:42 AM
Bridgitte Posts: 53
|
Cruzn wrote:
I feel there's something about this review that relates same too another review. . . Doesn't feel like a review feels more like an advert
Why don't you go check on the purple site reviews and then lets see if ur judgment is the same
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/16/2023 3:22:29 AM
Assetmanager Posts: 1163
|
Milo I think the problem is all the 5's. Nobody is perfect. However on the Purple Site I see it all the time and I get the feeling that the admin delete the reviews that are not rated like this.
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/16/2023 4:36:10 AM
Lord_randal Posts: 563
|
Assetmanager wrote:
Milo I think the problem is all the 5's. Nobody is perfect. However on the Purple Site I see it all the time and I get the feeling that the admin delete the reviews that are not rated like this.
Eventually, the comments and reviews are confirming my conclusions there is no perfection
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/16/2023 7:12:52 AM
Jerryboy Posts: 1507
|
@asset correct me if iam wrong brother but i think if not mistaken there was a negative review on this wg her images changed thats how i noticed i will try and hunt it but cant promise. @lord have an ice coffee for this warm day @milo have a chilled milo brew lets relax now
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/16/2023 9:01:38 AM
Assetmanager Posts: 1163
|
JB I can't remember this girl from anywhere. She has been operating for a long time. Reviews since 2019 on ESA. Can't find her on Redvelvet.co.za.
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/16/2023 10:25:28 AM
Jerryboy Posts: 1507
|
@asset cud b an error on my side brother
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/17/2023 1:09:05 AM
nevil Posts: 1439
|
if this guy milo rates the sp at all 5s probably by his standard she was impressive for him but maybe to another who has different standards she may not get all 5s it just comes down to what a punter would accept as a 5/5 even if she was rated as being a 90% lets say when it comes to the looks purely cos there is some other sp that is more prettier that still makes her a 5/5
different strokes for different folks i suppose 4s and 5s are top notch 3s are a maybe or if you in a hurry and wana blow a load asap 2s and below are a waste of time and money thats how i see it
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/17/2023 3:31:16 AM
Assetmanager Posts: 1163
|
You make a great point Nevil. We don't have a standard. .. The truth is we can't have one because it's very subjective.
As far as looks go we need to look at the pics and any reviews should describe what we saw and confirm if the person looks like the pics. Ratings are useless without a standard. We can describe the personality. Hygiene is either good or not considered. Same for neatness and cleanliness.
Just describe what you saw. Let everyone make up their own mind if it's good or bad.
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/17/2023 5:26:42 AM
Lord_randal Posts: 563
|
Assetmanager wrote:
You make a great point Nevil. We don't have a standard. .. The truth is we can't have one because it's very subjective.
As far as looks go we need to look at the pics and any reviews should describe what we saw and confirm if the person looks like the pics. Ratings are useless without a standard. We can describe the personality. Hygiene is either good or not considered. Same for neatness and cleanliness.
Just describe what you saw. Let everyone make up their own mind if it's good or bad.
I see two reviews of the same user and both of them are just 5/5 one after the other. I think it says all
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/17/2023 1:44:39 PM
Bridgitte Posts: 53
|
Yoh this is getting alot of attention, i went back into history of ratings by the known punters that add value and vet WGs and seen plenty of 10/10 and comments saying thanks etc and yet no one questions how can they rate 10/10, i saw plenty that for me wasnt a 10/10, but do i reply with negative comments ? Hell no, cos for me its about are they legit and not a scam and are they good and most importantly did the punter enjoy what he paid for.Some of the guys here have Double standards (you know who u are) but its fine, by me rating a WG 5/5 is for me and my liking and whether i enjoyed. U either take it or leave it, im not forcing you to go visit. Just advising you of MY experience and how felt. i will think about adding my experiences in future. Let the "lords" of this forum go find out for themselves and im yet to see some reviews instead of only negative comments.maybe you should go test the waters and let us know what's legit out there.Peace out.... edited by Milo on 11/17/2023
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/20/2023 4:14:49 AM
nevil Posts: 1439
|
something that seems abit strange is that when micheal asked the rate, it was a generic answer it wasnt based on what service you received specifically only
|
|
0
• permalink
|
11/20/2023 6:58:03 AM
Mr BarryP Posts: 970
|
Guilty as charged - I def put out a few 10/10 and stand by them. And agree - I saw many rated 10/10 but didnt agree either way I reviewed and they reviewed and that is what we need.
Double standards - for that to happen you must have
a standard in the first place.
Those who cant play coach - You Milo are a player.
milo wrote:
Yoh this is getting alot of attention, i went back into history of ratings by the known punters that add value and vet WGs and seen plenty of 10/10 and comments saying thanks etc and yet no one questions how can they rate 10/10, i saw plenty that for me wasnt a 10/10, but do i reply with negative comments ? Hell no, cos for me its about are they legit and not a scam and are they good and most importantly did the punter enjoy what he paid for.Some of the guys here have Double standards (you know who u are) but its fine, by me rating a WG 5/5 is for me and my liking and whether i enjoyed. U either take it or leave it, im not forcing you to go visit. Just advising you of MY experience and how felt. i will think about adding my experiences in future. Let the "lords" of this forum go find out for themselves and im yet to see some reviews instead of only negative comments.maybe you should go test the waters and let us know what's legit out there.Peace out.... edited by Milo on 11/17/2023
|
|
0
• permalink
|